files-community/Files

A modern file manager that helps users organize their files and folders.

31
Hotness score
84
Reliability score
44,359
Stars
over 7 years
Age
0
Published reviews
0
Questions

Scores

Hotness and reliability

The two headline scores, measured daily, with 30, 90, and 180 day views.

Hotness score

Jul 19, 2026

Current31

Previous31

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Hotness formula

40% Hot today + 40% Hot this week + 20% Breakout.

  • 40% Hot today: 14
  • 40% Hot this week: 38
  • 20% Breakout: 1
  • Stars gained: 1d: 3
  • Stars gained: 7d: 72
  • Stars gained: 14d: 213
  • Stars gained: 30d: 387
  • Stars gained: 90d: 1289

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score

Reliability score

Jul 19, 2026

Current84

Previous86

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Reliability formula

30% Continuity + 30% Closure + 20% Shipping + 10% Liveness + 10% Support burden.

  • 30% Continuity: 88
  • 30% Closure: 89
  • 20% Shipping: 63
  • 10% Liveness: 100
  • 10% Support burden: 79

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score

Reliability breakdown

What drives the reliability score

Component scores measured daily from GitHub activity (2026-07-18).

Continuity30% of headline88

Activity on 85 of 90 tracked days in the last 90 and 27 of 30 in the last 30.

Closure30% of headline89

Merged 139 of 175 PRs opened and closed 201 of 153 issues opened over the last 90 tracked days — PR flow carries 55% of this component, issue flow 45%.

Shipping20% of headline63

8 releases in the last 180 days, 4 in the last 90 and 1 in the last 30 — a steady cadence scores highest.

Liveness10% of headline100

Last push 0 days ago — freshness decays as pushes age (roughly halves every 83 days without a push).

Support burden10% of headline79

456 open issues against 44,359 stars — about 10 open issues per 1,000 stars. Lighter backlogs score higher.

Adoption confidence100

Modeled — how confidently teams are adopting this repo. Stargazers

Maintenance quality85

Modeled from PR/issue responsiveness and upkeep signals. Activity pulse

Risk score14

Modeled — lower is better; adoption and continuity risk. Repository

Stays active (30d)90%

Modeled chance the repo stays active over 30 days. Activity pulse

Stays active (90d)89%

Modeled chance the repo stays active over 90 days. Activity pulse

Release rhythm (180d)63

Regularity of releases over the last 180 days. Releases

Maintainer bus risk (90d)7%

Modeled — lower is better; concentration of commits in few maintainers. Contributors graph

Measured history

Project metrics

Weekly GitHub totals with 30, 90, and 180 day views.

Weekly star gains

Jul 19, 2026

Current92

Previous125

Weekly star gains

245-504-1,254
Full metrics details

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Cumulative stars

Jul 19, 2026

Current44,356

Previous44,264

Cumulative total

44,35622,1780
Full metrics details

Running total of the GitHub GraphQL stargazer count over time (not weekly deltas), reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues opened

Jul 12, 2026

Current15

Previous14

Weekly total

25130
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues closed

Jul 12, 2026

Current12

Previous12

Weekly total

32160
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests opened

Jul 12, 2026

Current12

Previous19

Weekly total

22110
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests closed

Jul 12, 2026

Current14

Previous15

Weekly total

22110
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests merged

Jul 12, 2026

Current10

Previous12

Weekly total

1890
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issue close ratio (daily)

Jul 17, 2026

Current0.00

Previous3.00

Daily ratio — a gap means nothing was opened that day

How this works: each day's value is issues closed that day ÷ issues opened that day. Days when nothing was opened render as gaps — never a rolling average or a made-up zero. Values above 1 mean the project closed more issues than arrived that day.

19.009.500.00
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

138 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: issues closed that day ÷ issues opened that day; blank when nothing was opened (a gap, not a zero).

DateIssues openedIssues closedStored score

Pull request close ratio (daily)

Jul 18, 2026

Current0.00

Previous0.33

Daily ratio — a gap means nothing was opened that day

How this works: each day's value is pull requests closed that day ÷ pull requests opened that day. Days when nothing was opened render as gaps — never a rolling average or a made-up zero. Values above 1 mean the project closed more pull requests than arrived that day.

4.002.000.00
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

126 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: pull requests closed that day ÷ pull requests opened that day; blank when nothing was opened (a gap, not a zero).

DatePRs openedPRs closedStored score

Releases

Jul 19, 2026

Current0

Previous1

Weekly total

210
Full metrics details

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Project Overview

Files is an open-source file manager for Windows, written in C# on WinUI 3 and maintained by the files-community organization under the MIT license. It covers everything File Explorer does — browsing, copying, moving, renaming, deleting — and adds the workflow features Explorer never grew into: a real tab strip, dual-pane browsing, color-coded file tags, inline Git information, built-in archive handling, and a themeable interface that follows the Windows 11 design language.

You can use it as your daily file manager on Windows 10 or 11 today. This is not an experimental side project: it has a multi-year release history, an active contributor base, and over 43,000 GitHub stars as of 2026-06-12. The MIT license means you can use and redistribute it commercially without restrictions.

One hard boundary up front: Files is Windows-only. The UI is built on the Windows App SDK, so there is no macOS or Linux build and no realistic path to one. If you need cross-platform, start with Double Commander or Spacedrive instead.

Key Challenges Addressed

  • One folder per window. Explorer's tabs arrived late and stay minimal. Files gives you a full tab strip with drag-to-reorder, duplicate tab, and reopen-closed-tab, so a multi-folder reorganization stays in one window.
  • Two-folder file shuffling. Copying between folders in Explorer means juggling windows. Files has a dual-pane mode: two independent panes side by side with drag and drop between them.
  • No metadata layer. Explorer organizes by folder hierarchy and nothing else. Files adds color-coded tags, so a file can belong to more than one grouping without being duplicated, and tags get their own sidebar section for browsing.
  • Archives as a separate tool. Files creates and extracts archives natively, so zip and 7z handling doesn't depend on a third-party context-menu extension.
  • Repositories are opaque in a file manager. Inside a Git repository, Files shows the current branch and per-file status, so you can see what changed before you switch to a terminal.

Getting Started

You have three install paths: the Microsoft Store, winget, or the classic installer from the official site at https://files.community. Use winget:

winget install --id FilesCommunity.Files -e

Launch Files, pin it to the taskbar, and browse a few folders. The defaults are sensible; you don't need to configure anything to get tabs and layouts working.

Sharp edges you'll hit immediately:

  • The Microsoft Store listing is paid — that's how the project funds development, not a different app. If you don't want to pay, the winget package and the classic installer from files.community are free and functionally identical. Install the free path first; buy the Store version later if you want to support the project.
  • If you enable "Set Files as the default file manager" (Settings → Advanced) and later uninstall the app without flipping the toggle off, folder-open actions keep routing to a handler that no longer exists and double-clicking folders fails until you repair the association. Disable the toggle before uninstalling, every time.
  • Files cold-starts slower than Explorer because explorer.exe is always resident in memory as the Windows shell. Keep Files running and pinned instead of launching it per use, and the difference disappears.

Features and Use Cases

Layouts that match the task. Files ships Details, Grid, Tiles, and a Columns layout, and it remembers layout per folder. Use Details with the Git column for repositories, Grid for image folders, and Columns when you're navigating deep trees and want the full path visible at once.

Tabs and dual pane together. Open each active project in its own tab, then split any tab into dual panes when you need to move files between two locations. Sorting a messy Downloads folder into project directories is a one-window job: Downloads on the left pane, destination on the right, drag and drop.

Tags as a second axis of organization. Assign color-coded tags from the context menu and browse by tag from the sidebar. Tag in-progress client work across scattered folders and you can pull it all up in one view without restructuring directories.

Git awareness. Inside a repository, Files shows the current branch and per-file status. It won't replace your terminal or Git client, but it answers "what did I touch in here?" without leaving the file manager.

Archives without a second tool. Create and extract zip and 7z archives directly from the context menu. For routine compress-and-send work you stop needing a separate archiver install.

Cloud and remote locations. When OneDrive, Google Drive, or Dropbox sync clients are installed, their folders surface in the sidebar. You can also connect to FTP locations by entering an ftp:// address in the path bar.

Ecosystem and Dependencies

Files sits on the current Microsoft desktop stack, which is most of why it feels native:

  • Windows App SDK and WinUI 3 provide the XAML UI layer, which gets you OS-consistent theming, dark mode, and native controls without an Electron-style memory tax.
  • CommunityToolkit supplies the MVVM plumbing the codebase is organized around.
  • FluentFTP backs the FTP support.
  • Archive handling builds on the 7-Zip engine rather than a custom implementation.
  • Installed cloud sync clients (OneDrive, Google Drive, Dropbox) are detected and surfaced as sidebar entries, and folders open in Windows Terminal from the context menu.

Files also loads shell context-menu extensions, so tools you've installed system-wide still appear. Some legacy extensions render differently than they do in Explorer — if a context-menu tool misbehaves, test it in Explorer to confirm whether the bug is in Files or the extension.

Architectural Overview

The app is a WinUI 3 XAML front end organized with MVVM: views bind to view models, and file operations live in injected services. That separation is what keeps a large community codebase reviewable — contributors can change a service implementation without touching XAML.

The part worth understanding is the storage layer. Windows offers two file APIs: the WinRT StorageFile layer, which marshals calls through a broker and is slow on bulk operations, and direct Win32 file APIs, which are fast. Files routes hot paths — directory enumeration, bulk copies — through Win32 rather than WinRT, which is why large-directory listing stays responsive in an app-store-style app.

Long-running operations (big copies, extractions) run as background tasks with progress reported in an ongoing-tasks flyout, so a slow transfer doesn't freeze the window you're navigating in.

The trade-off in this design: Files inherits the Windows App SDK release cycle. When the platform layer has a rendering or lifecycle bug, Files has to wait on Microsoft's fix or work around it.

Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • MIT license with no commercial-use strings attached.
  • Native Windows 11 look with dark mode and theming, without Electron overhead.
  • Tabs, dual pane, and a Columns layout in one tool — Explorer still offers only basic tabs.
  • Tags and Git status add organization and repo awareness Explorer doesn't have.
  • Built-in archive creation and extraction removes a third-party dependency.
  • Active development with a steady release cadence.

Cons:

  • Windows-only by architecture, not by roadmap gap.
  • Slower cold start than Explorer, since Explorer is always resident as the shell.
  • Windows App SDK dependency means upstream platform bugs surface in the app and fixes wait on Microsoft's cycle.
  • The paid Microsoft Store listing confuses newcomers who don't know the winget and classic installers are free.
  • Keyboard-driven power workflows are weaker than orthodox managers like Far Manager or Double Commander.

Comparison and Alternatives

Measured 90-day trends for this project and its alternatives.

GitHub stars

Weekly star gains

24574-97
Full metrics details

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

Files

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

164 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

167 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues opened

Weekly total

25130
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

Files

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues closed

Weekly total

32160
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Files

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests opened

Weekly total

22110
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

Files

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests closed

Weekly total

22110
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Files

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests merged

Weekly total

1890
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

Files

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

142 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Open/closed pull request ratio

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Files

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

164 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

167 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Open/closed issues ratio

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Files

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

164 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

167 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Releases

Weekly total

110
Full metrics details

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

Files

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Double Commander

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

164 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Far Manager

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Xplorer

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

167 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Hotness score

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

Files

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Double Commander

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

164 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Far Manager

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Xplorer

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

167 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score

Reliability score

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

Files

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Double Commander

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

164 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Far Manager

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Xplorer

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

167 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score

Explorer++ is the lightweight pick: a portable Win32 tabbed file manager with a tiny footprint and no install required. It looks dated and has no tags or Git integration, but it runs from a USB stick and starts instantly.

Double Commander is an orthodox dual-pane manager in the Total Commander tradition, cross-platform across Windows, Linux, and macOS, with plugins, batch rename, and deep keyboard support. The UI is utilitarian, but for bulk file operations it out-powers Files.

Far Manager is a keyboard-driven text-mode manager with a large plugin ecosystem. The learning curve is steep, but once the keybindings are in muscle memory it's the fastest option here for pure file manipulation.

Spacedrive takes a different angle: a Rust-based cross-platform explorer that indexes files across devices into one library. It's earlier-stage than the others — check its commit activity and release cadence before adopting it for daily work.

Xplorer is a Tauri-based cross-platform explorer that drew attention early but has seen little development activity in recent history. Check the commit log before depending on it; treat it as a reference implementation, not a daily driver.

Project Repo Hotness (~6mo) PRs merged (~6mo) Star growth (~6mo)
Files https://github.com/files-community/Files 56.68 66 3933
Explorer++ https://github.com/derceg/explorerplusplus metrics pending 0 23
Double Commander https://github.com/doublecmd/doublecmd metrics pending 0 35
Far Manager https://github.com/FarGroup/FarManager metrics pending 0 -3
Spacedrive https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive metrics pending 0 metrics pending
Xplorer https://github.com/kimlimjustin/xplorer metrics pending 0 24

The best overall alternative is Double Commander: it's mature, actively maintained, runs on all three desktop platforms, and its plugin and documentation ecosystem runs deeper than any other open-source file manager listed.

Conclusion

If you're a Windows developer or power user who wants tabs, dual-pane copying, tags, and Git status in one tool, install Files and make it your daily file manager — it's the most polished open-source Explorer replacement you can run today. The official documentation at https://files.community/docs covers every setting and shortcut. You lose nothing by running it alongside Explorer.

Do not enable "Set Files as the default file manager" and then uninstall the app without flipping the toggle off first — the folder-open association keeps pointing at the missing handler and double-clicking folders breaks until you repair it. Do this first: run winget install --id FilesCommunity.Files -e and drive Files side by side with Explorer for a week before touching any default-handler settings.

Join the conversation

Reviews · Questions · Posts

Share what you know about Files — write a review from your real experience, ask an implementation question, or publish a post about how you use it.

Share your experience

Write or update your review

Explain what worked, what broke down, and what another team should know before adopting Files.

Write your review now — it saves locally and publishes automatically after you sign in.

Rating
Positive attributes
Negative attributes

Project Q&A

Questions and answers

Browse implementation threads tied directly to files-community/Files. Each question links through to the full answer page.

Q&A No threads yet

Be the first to ask how teams run Files in production. Every question you post becomes a durable, searchable answer page other developers can find.

Ask the first question

Related posts

Posts tagged with the same topics

These posts come from the same topic surface as this repo, so readers can move from project evaluation into practical writeups and migration notes without leaving context.

Posts No topic-linked posts yet

Share how your team uses Files — a migration note, an architecture writeup, or a comparison. Your post reaches everyone browsing these same topics.

Write the first post
Get a weekly email with the hottest new projects in the Log Collection Agents and Fluent world.
No Spam. Unsubscribe easily at any time.

Copyright 2018-2026 Awesome Open Source.  All rights reserved.