JustVugg/colibri

Run GLM-5.2 (744B MoE) on a 25GB-RAM consumer machine β€” pure C, zero deps, experts streamed from disk. Tiny engine, immense model. 🐦

80
Hotness score
59
Reliability score
16,757
Stars
21 days
Age
0
Published reviews
0
Questions

Scores

Hotness and reliability

The two headline scores, measured daily, with 30, 90, and 180 day views.

Hotness score

Jul 19, 2026

Current80

Previous68

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

20 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Hotness formula

40% Hot today + 40% Hot this week + 20% Breakout.

  • 40% Hot today: 58
  • 40% Hot this week: 100
  • 20% Breakout: 65
  • Stars gained: 1d: 310
  • Stars gained: 7d: 7081
  • Stars gained: 14d: 16708
  • Stars gained: 30d: 0
  • Stars gained: 90d: 0

Per-day formula: 0.40 Γ— Hot today + 0.40 Γ— Hot week + 0.20 Γ— Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d Γ· max(1, stars 7d Γ· 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d Γ· max(1, stars 30d Γ· 30 Γ— 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d Γ· max(1, stars 90d Γ· 90 Γ— 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 Γ— log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 Γ— breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 Γ— log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 Γ— breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 Γ— breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 Γ— breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 Γ— breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score

Reliability score

Jul 19, 2026

Current59

Previous50

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

20 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Reliability formula

30% Continuity + 30% Closure + 20% Shipping + 10% Liveness + 10% Support burden.

  • 30% Continuity: 65
  • 30% Closure: 71
  • 20% Shipping: 0
  • 10% Liveness: 100
  • 10% Support burden: 96

Per-day formula: 0.30 Γ— Continuity + 0.30 Γ— Closure + 0.20 Γ— Shipping + 0.10 Γ— Liveness + 0.10 Γ— Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 Γ— (20% Γ— release ratio 30d + 30% Γ— release ratio 90d + 50% Γ— release ratio 180d); ratios are releases Γ· 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 βˆ’ 2 Γ— open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 Γ— exp(βˆ’pushed days ago Γ· 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score

Reliability breakdown

What drives the reliability score

Component scores measured daily from GitHub activity (2026-07-19).

Continuity30% of headline65

Activity on 13 of 20 tracked days in the last 90 and 13 of 20 in the last 30.

Closure30% of headline71

Merged 154 of 233 PRs opened and closed 123 of 158 issues opened over the last 90 tracked days β€” PR flow carries 55% of this component, issue flow 45%.

Shipping20% of headline0

0 releases in the last 180 days, 0 in the last 90 and 0 in the last 30 β€” a steady cadence scores highest.

Liveness10% of headline100

Last push 0 days ago β€” freshness decays as pushes age (roughly halves every 83 days without a push).

Support burden10% of headline96

34 open issues against 16,757 stars β€” about 2 open issues per 1,000 stars. Lighter backlogs score higher.

Adoption confidence53

Modeled β€” how confidently teams are adopting this repo. Stargazers

Maintenance quality54

Modeled from PR/issue responsiveness and upkeep signals. Activity pulse

Risk score22

Modeled β€” lower is better; adoption and continuity risk. Repository

Stays active (30d)54%

Modeled chance the repo stays active over 30 days. Activity pulse

Stays active (90d)56%

Modeled chance the repo stays active over 90 days. Activity pulse

Release rhythm (180d)0

Regularity of releases over the last 180 days. Releases

Maintainer bus risk (90d)55%

Modeled β€” lower is better; concentration of commits in few maintainers. Contributors graph

Measured history

Project metrics

Weekly GitHub totals with 30, 90, and 180 day views.

Weekly star gains

Jul 19, 2026

Current10,096

Previous6,341

Weekly star gains

10,0965,0480
Full metrics details

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

20 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Cumulative stars

Jul 19, 2026

Current16,447

Previous6,351

Cumulative total

16,4478,2240
Full metrics details

Running total of the GitHub GraphQL stargazer count over time (not weekly deltas), reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

20 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues opened

Jul 19, 2026

Current115

Previous43

Weekly total

115580
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

19 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues closed

Jul 19, 2026

Current108

Previous15

Weekly total

108540
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

19 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests opened

Jul 19, 2026

Current172

Previous61

Weekly total

172860
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

19 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests closed

Jul 19, 2026

Current130

Previous52

Weekly total

130650
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

19 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests merged

Jul 19, 2026

Current121

Previous33

Weekly total

121610
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

19 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issue close ratio (daily)

Jul 19, 2026

Current0.00

Previous0.29

Daily ratio β€” a gap means nothing was opened that day

How this works: each day's value is issues closed that day Γ· issues opened that day. Days when nothing was opened render as gaps β€” never a rolling average or a made-up zero. Values above 1 mean the project closed more issues than arrived that day.

3.001.500.00
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

12 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: issues closed that day Γ· issues opened that day; blank when nothing was opened (a gap, not a zero).

DateIssues openedIssues closedStored score

Pull request close ratio (daily)

Jul 19, 2026

Current0.00

Previous0.50

Daily ratio β€” a gap means nothing was opened that day

How this works: each day's value is pull requests closed that day Γ· pull requests opened that day. Days when nothing was opened render as gaps β€” never a rolling average or a made-up zero. Values above 1 mean the project closed more pull requests than arrived that day.

2.501.250.00
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

13 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: pull requests closed that day Γ· pull requests opened that day; blank when nothing was opened (a gap, not a zero).

DatePRs openedPRs closedStored score

Join the conversation

Reviews Β· Questions Β· Posts

Share what you know about colibri β€” write a review from your real experience, ask an implementation question, or publish a post about how you use it.

Share your experience

Write or update your review

Explain what worked, what broke down, and what another team should know before adopting colibri.

Write your review now β€” it saves locally and publishes automatically after you sign in.

Rating
Positive attributes
Negative attributes

Project Q&A

Questions and answers

Browse implementation threads tied directly to JustVugg/colibri. Each question links through to the full answer page.

Q&A No threads yet

Be the first to ask how teams run colibri in production. Every question you post becomes a durable, searchable answer page other developers can find.

Ask the first question

Related posts

Posts tagged with the same topics

These posts come from the same topic surface as this repo, so readers can move from project evaluation into practical writeups and migration notes without leaving context.

Posts No topic-linked posts yet

Share how your team uses colibri β€” a migration note, an architecture writeup, or a comparison. Your post reaches everyone browsing these same topics.

Write the first post
Get a weekly email with the hottest new projects in the General LLM and Local & On-Device LLM Inference world.
No Spam. Unsubscribe easily at any time.

Copyright 2018-2026 Awesome Open Source.  All rights reserved.