JetBrains/intellij-community

IntelliJ IDEA & IntelliJ Platform

50
Hotness score
49
Reliability score
20,383
Stars
almost 15 years
Age
0
Published reviews
0
Questions

Scores

Hotness and reliability

The two headline scores, measured daily, with 30, 90, and 180 day views.

Hotness score

Jul 19, 2026

Current50

Previous18

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Hotness formula

40% Hot today + 40% Hot this week + 20% Breakout.

  • 40% Hot today: 14
  • 40% Hot this week: 32
  • 20% Breakout: 1
  • Stars gained: 1d: 3
  • Stars gained: 7d: 38
  • Stars gained: 14d: 64
  • Stars gained: 30d: 20383
  • Stars gained: 90d: 20383

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score

Reliability score

Jul 19, 2026

Current49

Previous49

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Reliability formula

30% Continuity + 30% Closure + 20% Shipping + 10% Liveness + 10% Support burden.

  • 30% Continuity: 48
  • 30% Closure: 0
  • 20% Shipping: 80
  • 10% Liveness: 100
  • 10% Support burden: 84

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score

Reliability breakdown

What drives the reliability score

Component scores measured daily from GitHub activity (2026-07-18).

Continuity30% of headline48

Activity on 13 of 90 tracked days in the last 90 and 4 of 30 in the last 30.

Closure30% of headline0

Merged 0 of 0 PRs opened and closed 0 of 0 issues opened over the last 90 tracked days — PR flow carries 55% of this component, issue flow 45%.

Shipping20% of headline80

25 releases in the last 180 days, 16 in the last 90 and 4 in the last 30 — a steady cadence scores highest.

Liveness10% of headline100

Last push 1 days ago — freshness decays as pushes age (roughly halves every 83 days without a push).

Support burden10% of headline84

Open-issue load isn't tracked for this repo yet.

Adoption confidence65

Modeled — how confidently teams are adopting this repo. Stargazers

Maintenance quality56

Modeled from PR/issue responsiveness and upkeep signals. Activity pulse

Risk score35

Modeled — lower is better; adoption and continuity risk. Repository

Stays active (30d)50%

Modeled chance the repo stays active over 30 days. Activity pulse

Stays active (90d)63%

Modeled chance the repo stays active over 90 days. Activity pulse

Release rhythm (180d)100

Regularity of releases over the last 180 days. Releases

Maintainer bus risk (90d)48%

Modeled — lower is better; concentration of commits in few maintainers. Contributors graph

Measured history

Project metrics

Weekly GitHub totals with 30, 90, and 180 day views.

Issues opened

Feb 22, 2026

Current0

Previous0

Weekly total

110
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues closed

Feb 22, 2026

Current0

Previous0

Weekly total

110
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests opened

Feb 22, 2026

Current6

Previous15

Weekly total

1580
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests closed

Feb 22, 2026

Current5

Previous6

Weekly total

950
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests merged

Feb 22, 2026

Current0

Previous0

Weekly total

110
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull request close ratio (daily)

Feb 27, 2026

Current5.00

Previous4.00

Daily ratio — a gap means nothing was opened that day

How this works: each day's value is pull requests closed that day ÷ pull requests opened that day. Days when nothing was opened render as gaps — never a rolling average or a made-up zero. Values above 1 mean the project closed more pull requests than arrived that day.

6.003.000.00
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

26 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: pull requests closed that day ÷ pull requests opened that day; blank when nothing was opened (a gap, not a zero).

DatePRs openedPRs closedStored score

Releases

Jul 19, 2026

Current1

Previous0

Weekly total

420
Full metrics details

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Project Overview

JetBrains intellij-community is the open-source codebase behind IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition and a large part of the IntelliJ Platform. Your team can use it to inspect and modify IDE internals, run the IDE from source, and build plugin functionality on top of platform extension points.

The repository is broad and monorepo-style, with major areas like platform/, plugins/, java/, jps/, and build/. You get source-level access to editor infrastructure, indexing, inspections, refactoring pipelines, and packaging/testing scripts.

This scope gives you deep control, but it also means heavy onboarding cost. Your team should plan for a large checkout, substantial IDE indexing time, and careful branch alignment when Android modules are involved.

Key Challenges Addressed

You often need one consistent IDE runtime that supports many languages, code models, and UI workflows without fragmenting your tooling stack. The IntelliJ Platform approach addresses that by centralizing project models, indexing, PSI/UAST-based code understanding, and shared editor services in one runtime.

You may also need extensibility without carrying a long-lived fork. The platform’s plugin and extension-point model lets your team add inspections, actions, tool windows, and integrations while keeping most customization isolated.

You may need reproducible packaging and test entry points for desktop IDE distribution. The repo includes scriptable build/test paths like installers.cmd and tests.cmd, so your team can wire IDE packaging and test execution into CI pipelines.

Getting Started

The repository README documents a practical bootstrap path. Your team needs Git plus IntelliJ IDEA 2023.2 or newer to open and build from source.

  • Clone the repository and enter the project root.
  • Pull required Android-related modules with getPlugins.sh or getPlugins.bat when your workflow needs them.
  • Open the root directory in IntelliJ IDEA, resolve required plugins (for example Kotlin when prompted), and run a normal project build.
  • Use the predefined IDEA run configuration to launch the IDE from source.
git clone https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community.git
cd intellij-community
./getPlugins.sh
./installers.cmd -Dintellij.build.target.os=current
./tests.cmd -Dintellij.build.test.configurations=ApiCheckTest

Immediate sharp edges to plan for:

  • Keep intellij-community and Android module checkouts on matching branches/tags when both are present.
  • GitHub-hosted build workflows for full builds can require larger runners; local builds or prebuilt binaries can be the practical path for personal accounts.
  • First open can require enabling or updating bundled IDE plugins before the project sync stabilizes.

Features and Use Cases

You get a full desktop IDE platform with production-grade language tooling internals, not a small plugin sample. That changes what your team can realistically ship.

  • Platform internals in platform/: project model, VFS, indexing, editor, actions, and threading primitives.
  • Language/tooling modules in areas like java/, jvm/, xml/, and json/.
  • Bundled plugin surface in plugins/ for optional capabilities and integrations.
  • Build and packaging paths in build/, installers.cmd, and related scripts.
  • Test execution entry points in tests.cmd and IDE run configurations.

Common implementation patterns for your team:

  • Build custom inspections and quick-fixes for internal coding standards.
  • Create an internal IDE distribution with preconfigured plugins and settings.
  • Trace performance or correctness issues by stepping through platform source instead of black-box debugging.
  • Contribute upstream fixes when your team hits platform-level defects.

Ecosystem and Dependencies

Your team can treat this repository as the core runtime and pair it with surrounding IntelliJ ecosystem tools.

If your workflow centers on plugin delivery from separate repos, Gradle IntelliJ Plugin can simplify plugin build/test/sign/publish workflows. If your team builds custom language support, Grammar-Kit is a common parser-generation companion inside IntelliJ-oriented stacks. If your team wants a complex reference plugin codebase, intellij-rust is useful for studying large plugin architecture patterns.

Your gain is operational leverage: platform internals in one place, plus external companion tooling for plugin lifecycle management.

Architectural Overview

The repository follows a layered platform-plus-modules shape.

  • platform/ contains core services and UI/runtime foundations.
  • java/, jvm/, xml/, json/, python/, and related directories hold language/tooling implementations.
  • plugins/ contains bundled extension modules that plug into platform extension points.
  • jps/ and build-related code support project build infrastructure.
  • build/ plus top-level build scripts drive packaging and distribution tasks.

At runtime, your team typically works through this flow: project model and file system events feed indexing and caches; code insight and inspections consume those indexes; editor actions and refactorings execute through platform services and plugin extension points. This design matters because you can add functionality at extension boundaries instead of patching core paths, reducing fork pressure and upgrade friction.

Pros and Cons

  • Pro: Very deep source visibility for editor, inspections, refactoring, and packaging internals.
  • Pro: Mature extension model that supports targeted customization without immediate full-fork commitment.
  • Pro: Clear scriptable entry points for packaging and test execution.
  • Con: Large codebase and heavy local setup cost for first-time onboarding.
  • Con: Build and runtime assumptions can require specific IDE/plugin versions during bootstrap.
  • Con: Broad scope means your team needs strong module boundaries internally to avoid fragile custom patches.

Comparison and Alternatives

Measured 90-day trends for this project and its alternatives.

GitHub stars

Weekly star gains

20,31047-20,216
Full metrics details

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

Intellij Community

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

81 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Lapce

GitHub GraphQL current stargazer cohort, reconstructed from starredAt events and totalCount retrieved in one stable pagination walk. GitHub does not expose historical unstar events, so this is not an exact ledger of past star counts.

41 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues opened

Weekly total

1,0305150
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

Intellij Community

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

177 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

39 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Issues closed

Weekly total

8924460
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Intellij Community

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

177 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

39 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests opened

Weekly total

9174590
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

Intellij Community

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

177 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

39 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests closed

Weekly total

8374190
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Intellij Community

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

177 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

39 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Pull requests merged

Weekly total

4722360
Full metrics details

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

Intellij Community

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

38 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

177 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

179 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

39 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub API observation. Historical values render only when the source provides a real observation for that day.

178 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Open/closed pull request ratio

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Intellij Community

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

81 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Lapce

GitHub Search pull-request totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

41 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Open/closed issues ratio

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

Intellij Community

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

81 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Lapce

GitHub Search issue totals queried for exact UTC days; rolling values are sums of proven daily counts.

41 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Releases

Weekly total

420
Full metrics details

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

Intellij Community

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscode

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Netbeans

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Eclipse.platform.ui

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

81 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Vscodium

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue
Lapce

GitHub release published_at events bucketed by UTC day; drafts are excluded.

41 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

DateValue

Hotness score

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

Intellij Community

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Vscode

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Netbeans

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Eclipse.platform.ui

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

81 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Vscodium

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score
Lapce

Derived only from GitHub GraphQL starredAt events after daily star totals are reconciled.

41 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.40 × Hot today + 0.40 × Hot week + 0.20 × Breakout.

  • Same-day multiplier = stars 1d ÷ max(1, stars 7d ÷ 7)
  • Weekly multiplier = stars 7d ÷ max(1, stars 30d ÷ 30 × 7)
  • Fortnight multiplier = stars 14d ÷ max(1, stars 90d ÷ 90 × 14)
  • Hot today = clamp(70 × log-scale(stars 1d, 1000) + 30 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4))
  • Hot week = clamp(75 × log-scale(stars 7d, 5000) + 25 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3))
  • Breakout = clamp(35 × breakout-scale(same-day, 4) + 40 × breakout-scale(weekly, 3) + 25 × breakout-scale(fortnight, 2.5))
DateStarsStars 1dStars 7dStars 14dStars 30dStars 90dSame-day multiplierWeekly multiplierFortnight multiplierHot todayHot weekBreakoutStored score

Reliability score

Weekly average

100500
Full metrics details

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

Intellij Community

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Vscode

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Netbeans

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Eclipse.platform.ui

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

81 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Vscodium

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

180 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score
Lapce

Derived from the displayed continuity, closure, shipping, liveness, and support-burden components.

41 observed daily rows. Missing days are not fabricated.

Per-day formula: 0.30 × Continuity + 0.30 × Closure + 0.20 × Shipping + 0.10 × Liveness + 0.10 × Support burden.

  • Continuity = 35% active ratio 90d + 20% active ratio 30d + 15% PR efficiency 90d + 10% PR efficiency 30d + 10% liveness + 10% observed-history coverage
  • Closure = 55% PR merge efficiency 90d + 45% issue close efficiency 90d
  • Shipping = 100 × (20% × release ratio 30d + 30% × release ratio 90d + 50% × release ratio 180d); ratios are releases ÷ 2, 6, and 12, capped at 1
  • Support burden = 100 − 2 × open issues per 1,000 stars
  • Liveness = 100 × exp(−pushed days ago ÷ 120)

Stars, issues, pull requests, and releases are daily observations. Pushed-days and license are repository snapshot-derived inputs and are not independent historical GitHub events.

DateIssues openedIssues closedPRs openedPRs mergedReleasesStarsOpen issuesPushed days agoContinuityClosureShippingLivenessSupport burdenLicenseObserved daysMissing daysNeeds healingStored score

If your team is choosing a primary open-source code editor or IDE codebase to extend, credible alternatives include Visual Studio Code, Apache NetBeans, Eclipse Platform UI, VSCodium, and Lapce.

Project Repo Adoption confidence (~6mo) PRs merged (~6mo) Star growth (~6mo)
IntelliJ IDEA Community https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community not yet tracked not yet tracked not yet tracked
Visual Studio Code https://github.com/microsoft/vscode metrics pending 0 0
Apache NetBeans https://github.com/apache/netbeans 72.92 445 304
Eclipse Platform UI https://github.com/eclipse-platform/eclipse.platform.ui metrics pending 0 metrics pending
VSCodium https://github.com/vscodium/vscodium not yet tracked not yet tracked not yet tracked
Lapce https://github.com/lapce/lapce metrics pending 0 metrics pending

Best overall alternative: Visual Studio Code. You get exceptionally broad extension coverage and mature release/documentation workflows that usually reduce maintenance overhead for day-to-day platform customization.

Conclusion

JetBrains intellij-community is strongest when your team needs direct control over a full IDE platform, from code insight internals to packaging and test automation. The main trade-off is operational weight: onboarding, indexing, and build complexity are materially higher than lightweight editor codebases.

Your most important engineering takeaway is to treat extension points as your default customization boundary, keep forked core patches minimal, and validate changes against upstream workflows documented in the repository, the official IntelliJ Platform SDK docs, and the JetBrains community channels.

Join the conversation

Reviews · Questions · Posts

Share what you know about intellij-community — write a review from your real experience, ask an implementation question, or publish a post about how you use it.

Share your experience

Write or update your review

Explain what worked, what broke down, and what another team should know before adopting intellij-community.

Write your review now — it saves locally and publishes automatically after you sign in.

Rating
Positive attributes
Negative attributes

Project Q&A

Questions and answers

Browse implementation threads tied directly to JetBrains/intellij-community. Each question links through to the full answer page.

Q&A No threads yet

Be the first to ask how teams run intellij-community in production. Every question you post becomes a durable, searchable answer page other developers can find.

Ask the first question

Related posts

Posts tagged with the same topics

These posts come from the same topic surface as this repo, so readers can move from project evaluation into practical writeups and migration notes without leaving context.

Posts No topic-linked posts yet

Share how your team uses intellij-community — a migration note, an architecture writeup, or a comparison. Your post reaches everyone browsing these same topics.

Write the first post
Get a weekly email with the hottest new projects in the Desktop Application and Intellij Community world.
No Spam. Unsubscribe easily at any time.

Copyright 2018-2026 Awesome Open Source.  All rights reserved.